Review posted Adam Reviewed by Adam Reviewing M Capow Bib Rated 5 out of 5 5 Stars Had been looking for bibs that excel in the backcountry and can still hold their own in the resort and these are the ones!! The material is supple and light; perfect for splitboarding. I had a pair of Trewth bibs in the past that I loved but the fit was a little boxy; these are slimmer and fit great. The Medium Regular feels perfect for me at 6'0" 150 pounds. Loading... Read more I recommend this product Was this helpful? 0 people voted yes 0 people voted no
Review posted dave Reviewed by dave Verified Reviewer Reviewing M Capow Bib [OUTLET] Ski or Board Snowboard Backcountry vs Resort Primarily Resort Age 50-54 Height 6ft 1″ Weight 185-189 Waist (inches) 35 Natural inseam (inches) 34 Body Shape Average Size Purchased XL Rated 5 out of 5 Love these bibs Love this bib. I tried the large and switched out for an XL, but not because the large was a poor fit, I just couldn't squat w/o it binding up a bit and I like room. The XL is totally unbinding and such a comfortable fit I forget its there. I love the functionality. the pockets, the vents, fantastic! My only grip is that the bottoms are a wee bit snug over the top of my snowBoard boots. The boots are brand-new and high-end, and I a big improvement over my last pair. However, it's these bibs that I'm super stoked on every day (4 so far this season) I'm on the mountain. Loading... Read more I recommend this product Sizing Rated -1 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Runs small, 0 is True to size and 2 is Runs large Runs small True to size Runs large Quality Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Happiness Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Was this helpful? 0 people voted yes 0 people voted no
Review posted Scott G. Reviewed by Scott G. Verified Buyer Reviewing M Capow Bib Ski or Board Alpine Ski Backcountry vs Resort 50/50 Resort & Backcountry Age 50-54 Height 6ft Weight 190-194 Size Purchased M Rated 5 out of 5 Best. Bib. Ever. On my second pair of the Capow bib. These are my favorite bibs of all time. Loading... Read more I recommend this product Sizing Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Runs small, 0 is True to size and 2 is Runs large Runs small True to size Runs large Quality Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Happiness Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Was this helpful? 0 people voted yes 0 people voted no
Review posted Lew N. Reviewed by Lew N., from United States Verified Buyer Reviewing M Capow Bib Ski or Board Skier Backcountry vs Resort Primarily Resort Age 55-59 Height 5ft 11″ Weight 190-194 Body Shape Average Size Purchased M Rated 5 out of 5 My Favorite Bibbs / Love the Brand The sizing is perfect, especially the language/description regarding sizing and a relaxed fit. Loading... Read more I recommend this product Sizing Rated 1 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Runs small, 0 is True to size and 2 is Runs large Runs small True to size Runs large Quality Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Happiness Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Was this helpful? 0 people voted yes 0 people voted no
Review posted Austin M. Reviewed by Austin M., from United States Verified Reviewer Reviewing M Capow Bib Ski or Board Snowboarder Backcountry vs Resort 50/50 Resort & Backcountry Age 40-44 Height 5ft 6" Weight 150-154 Body Shape Average Size Purchased S Rated 5 out of 5 Solid I finally got to put these to test and I am impressed. They are pretty light weight with room for layering and the waterproofing is solid. I have used them in all conditions from dry and cold to wet and warm and I love them. All the pockets are a perk, especially for uphill/backcountry. My only regret was buying them before they came out with the short version, the legs are a little long on me but I still love them. Loading... Read more I recommend this product Sizing Rated 1 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Runs small, 0 is True to size and 2 is Runs large Runs small True to size Runs large Quality Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Happiness Rated 5 out of 5 Poor Excellent Was this helpful? 0 people voted yes 0 people voted no
